Analysis of Copyright Disputes in the Welcome Monument Sketch Case: Between Economic Rights and Obligations of Public Institutions (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 35/Pdt.Sus-Hak Copyright/2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v3i2.4241Keywords:
Copyright, Economic Rights. Legal DisputesAbstract
The copyright dispute over the Welcome Monument Sketch between the heirs of the late Henk Nunjung and PT. Grand Indonesia focuses on economic rights related to the use of a logo that resembles a sketch by Henk Nhang without permission. The heirs claim the right to economic compensation because PT. Grand Indonesia used this logo from 2004 to 2020 without approval. Based on Law no. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, the moral and economic rights of copyrighted works remain with the creator or his heirs. The court decided that the copyright for the sketch was Henk Nhang's personal property as an artist, not the result of his official relationship as Deputy Governor of DKI Jakarta. As a result of this violation, PT. Grand Indonesia is required to pay compensation of Rp. 16,000,000,000 to the heirs. This case emphasizes the importance of economic rights in protecting copyrighted works from unauthorized exploitation.
References
Asmara, C. A. D. F., Arifin, Z., & Anwar, F. M. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Cipta antara Pencipta Lagu dan Penyanyi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(2), 860-872.
Darling, K. (2015). Occupy copyright: a law & economic analysis of US author termination rights. Buff. L. Rev., 63, 147.
Dewi, C. I. D. L. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Terhadap Pelanggaran Moral Dalam Kerangka Perlindungan Hak Cipta. Jurnal Yustitia, 12(1), 13-20.
Fathanudien, A., & Maharani, V. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Cipta terhadap Buku Elektronik (E-Book) di Era Globalisasi. Logika: Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan, 14(01), 52-63.
Fikri, I. (2022). Perlindungan Hak Ekonomi dalam Karya Adaptasi Berdasarkan Hukum Tentang Hak Cipta. Ijtihad: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam, 15(2), 217.
Hadfield, G. K. (1988). The economics of copyright: An historical perspective. In Copyright L. Symp. (Vol. 38, p. 1).
Harini, N. M., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Arini, D. G. D. (2021). Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemilik Hak Cipta Musik Dan Lagu Dalam Pembayaran Royalti Oleh Yayasan Karya Cipta Indonesia. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(1), 89-94.
Kilanta, D. R. (2017). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Hak Cipta Berdasarkan Undang- Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Lex Crimen, 6(3).
Lalamentik, H. R. (2018). Kajian Hukum Tentang Hak Terkait (Neighboring Right) Sebagai Hak Ekonomi Pencipta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Nomor 28 Tahun 2014. Lex Privatum, 6(6).
Lendeng, S. A. (2021). Tinjauan Hukum Hak Cipta Dalam Bidang Karya Sinematografi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Lex Privatum, 9(2).
Liemer, S. P. (2005). How We Lost Our Moral Rights and the Door Closed on Non- Economic Values in Copyright. J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L., 5, i.
Lim, E. C. (2018). On the Uneasy Interface between Economic Rights, Moral Rights and Users' Rights in Copyright Law: Can Canada Learn from the UK Experience. SCRIPTed, 15, 70.
Menell, P. S. (2016). Economic Analysis of Copyright Notice: Tracing and Scope in the Digital Age. BUL Rev., 96, 967.
O'Hare, M. (1982). Copyright and the protection of economic rights. Journal of Cultural Economics, 33-48.
Rognstad, O. A. (2014). Restructuring the Economic Rights in Copyright-Some Reflections on an Alternative Model. J. Copyright Soc'y USA, 62, 503.
Rotinsulu, L. U. (2016). Penegakkan Hukum Atas Pelanggaran Hak Ekonomi Pencipta Lagu Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014. Lex Crimen, 5(3).
Rumbekwan, R. G. (2016). Penyelesaian Sengketa Akibat Terjadinya Pelanggaran Hak Cipta di pengadilan Niaga. Lex Crimen, 5(3).
Samuelson, P. (2000). Economic and constitutional influences on copyright law in the United States. Available at SSRN 234738.
Sari, R. T. N., Nazhip, W. H., Batubara, G. V., & Wahyuni, R. (2023). Perlindungan Konten Kreator Terhadap Konten Reupload Perspektif Hak Cipta. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(6), 10564-10577.
Syahputra, R., Kridasaksana, D., & Arifin, Z. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Musisi Atas Hak Cipta Dalam Pembayaran Royalti. Semarang Law Review (SLR), 3(1), 84-97.
Tirtakoesoemah, A. J., & Arafat, M. R. (2020). Penerapan Teori Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Atas Penyiaran. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 18(1).
Towse, R. (1999). Copyright and economic incentives: an application to performers’ rights in the music industry. Kyklos, 52(3), 369-390.
Visser, C. (2004). Applicable law in online copyright disputes: a proposal emerges. SA Mercantile Law Journal, 16(4), 765-778.
Watt, R. (2010). Copyright and contract law: Economic theory of copyright contracts. J. Intell. Prop. L., 18, 173.
Widowati, R. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Cipta Dalam Jual Beli Karya Sastra Pada Marketplace. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 5(2), 220-230.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
