Legal Analysis of Acts of Default in Cooperation Agreements (Case Study of Decision Number 48/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Idm)

Authors

  • Audrey Bintang Silado Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i1.504

Keywords:

Default, Cooperation Agreement, Consequences of Default, Settlement Efforts

Abstract

The agreement was born because of agreements between the parties, which gave rise to rights and obligations for the parties involved. Every agreement that is made always aspires that what is agreed upon can run as it should, but in practice there are often broken promises between the parties or what is known as default. Default is a situation where one of the bound parties is negligent or does not fulfill the obligations set out in the agreement. A debtor is declared in default if: does not do what is agreed upon in the agreement, carries out what was promised but is not in accordance with the agreement, does something that cannot be done in the agreement. In the case of the cooperation agreement between Plaintiff Puji Riyanto and Defendant I Susi Suryani and Defendant II Atoillah Dalil, this cooperation agreement was deemed to have defaulted where the defendants neglected to return the capital money and profits for the cooperation agreement to make Alfamart franchise stores. The purpose of writing this journal is to find out the consequences of default according to the Civil Code and legal settlement efforts for default. The writing method used in this paper is normative juridical. The legal consequences of default are cancellation of agreements, compensation, transfer of risks and paying court fees. Legal settlement efforts for acts of default are means of preventive and repressive legal protection.

References

Arif, Cahyadi. “Implikasi Yuridis Perbuatan Wanprestasi Atas Perjanjian Kerja Sama Pembiayaan Dikaitkan Adanya Jaminan Atas Nama Pihak Ketiga.”

Hidayati, Shafira Athia Nur, dan Tsanya Nofrianti Sukardi. “Analisis Perbuatan Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Sama.”

Rizayusmanda, dan Budi Aspani. ““Bentuk Penyelesaian Hukum Wanprestasi Pada Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Secara Online.”

Sinaga, Niru Anita, dan Nurlely Darwis. “Wanprestasi dan Akibatnya Dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian.”

Universitas Nasional. Diakses dari : http://repository.unas.ac.id/5548/3/BAB%20II.pdf.

Yahman. 2014. Karakteristik Wanprestasi dan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Yang Lahir dari Hubungan Kontraktual. Jakarta, Prenadamedia Group.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Silado, A. B. (2023). Legal Analysis of Acts of Default in Cooperation Agreements (Case Study of Decision Number 48/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Idm). QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(1), 644–650. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i1.504

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): June 2023

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).