Legal Analysis of the IKEA Trademark Removal Dispute Case (Study of Decision Number 165 PK/Pdt.Sus/2012)

Authors

  • Maurend Benaya Immanuel Susanto Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Gunardi Lie Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i1.537

Keywords:

Brand, Mark Removal

Abstract

Brands have an important function for their owners, especially in the era of global trade. Trademarks provide an indication of the origin and quality of the goods or services traded. Trademark owners have the exclusive right to authorize or prohibit others from using the same or similar trademarks as theirs. Indonesia uses a constitutive registration system, in which exclusive rights are given to registered marks. Trademark applicants may not register the same mark as another well-known trademark. Registered trademark must be used. Trademark cancellation is carried out when the brand has not been used for three consecutive years. In general, trademark revocation occurs when a mark is not used in trade in goods and services. If the former owner still wants the same trademark rights, he/she must apply for trademark registration and go through the entire registration procedure. If the other party applies for the mark first, the old owner can object. If this effort fails, he can submit an annulment to the Commercial Court, cassation, and review.

References

Adrian Sutedi,Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.2013

Erlina,B. (2013).Analisis Penghapusan MerekTerdaftar Oleh Direktorat Merek (Studi pada Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan IntelektualKementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia). Pranata Hukum,Bagian 8, (No. 1),hlm.34.

Pasal 68 Undang-Undang 15 Tahun 2001 Tentang Merek

Pasal 74 ayat (1) UU Tentang Merek

Perdana, K. (2017).Kelemahan Undang-Undang Merek Dalam Hal Pendaftaran Merek (Studi Atas Putusan Sengketa Merek Pierre Cardin). Privat Law,Bag. 5, (No.2), hlm .91

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 165 PK/Pdt.Sus Tahun 2012

Rahmi Jened, Hukum Merek (Trademark Law) Dalam Era Global & Integrasi Ekonomi, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta. 2015

Setiadharma, P. (2016). Sedikit Kisah Tentang Hapusnya Merek IKEA.

Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Susanto, M. B. I., Lie, G., & Syailendra Putra, M. R. (2023). Legal Analysis of the IKEA Trademark Removal Dispute Case (Study of Decision Number 165 PK/Pdt.Sus/2012). QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(1), 563–566. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i1.537

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): June 2023

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).