Efektivitas Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan atas Perkara Kekerasan dalam Lingkup Kekeluargaan (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Lubuk Pakam)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7239Keywords:
Judicial Consideration, Domestic Violence, Court Verdict, Restorative JusticeAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of judges’ considerations in delivering verdicts in cases of domestic violence, using a case study of decision number 1076/Pid.B/2025/PN Lbp at the Lubuk Pakam District Court. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method with a case study approach through direct courtroom observation, documentation, and literature review. The findings reveal that the judge’s considerations encompassed juridical, sociological, and psychological aspects in a balanced manner. The judgment was based not only on legal evidence but also on the social context of the family relationship between the defendant and the victim. The four-month imprisonment sentence demonstrates an attempt to balance legal certainty, substantive justice, and humanity. This study emphasizes the importance of judges’ sensitivity to social dimensions in family violence cases so that verdicts serve not only as punitive measures but also as restorative and educational acts of justice.
References
Gustini, D. (2023). Nilai Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan dalam Putusan Hakim Pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 53(2), 145–160.
Hamzah, A. (2020). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Hidayat, R. (2019). Disparitas Putusan Hakim dalam Perkara Kekerasan Rumah Tangga. Jurnal Yustisia, 8(3), 215–230.
Lestari, S., & Pratama, R. (2021). Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Lex Scientia, 5(1), 50–62.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Moeljatno. (2021). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Rahardjo, S. (2022). Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Siregar, D., & Sitorus, E. (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perspektif Keadilan Substantif. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 17(1), 55–69.
Wulandari, T. (2020). Dilema Hakim dalam Menangani Perkara Kekerasan Rumah Tangga. Jurnal Lex Et Societatis, 8(6), 34–45
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
