Implementation of Formal English Use in Direct Communication Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7368Keywords:
Formal English, Direct Communication, Language Register, Verbal And Nonverbal Communication, Communicative-Based InstructionAbstract
This study examines the implementation of formal English in direct communication among high school students, focusing on both verbal (vocabulary, sentence structure) and nonverbal (intonation, gestures) aspects. Using a quantitative descriptive method with 28 eleventh-grade students at a private high school, the research employed a three-phase design: (1) diagnostic pre-test,where students filled out a language background questionnaire and completed a short individual presentation to assess their initial formal English use; (2) structured training intervention, which included direct instruction on formal sentence patterns, academic vocabulary, and appropriate tone, followed by guided practice through simulated speaking tasks; and (3) presentation-based post-test, in which students gave individual presentations in groups, and their verbal and nonverbal performance was assessed using rubrics and observation checklists. The analysis focused on students’ awareness of language register in formal contexts, supported by communicative-based instruction emphasizing real-life academic language use. Results revealed that while 78.5% of students initially struggled to distinguish formal from informal registers, the intervention significantly improved informal-to-formal sentence transformation (80% accuracy) and academic vocabulary usage (+40%). Persistent challenges emerged in nonverbal elements, including inconsistent eye contact (65% of students) and flat intonation (45%). The study demonstrates the efficacy of explicit instruction and recommends integrating structured nonverbal training into language curricula through targeted classroom activities.
References
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.
Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.
McCarthy, M., & O’Keeffe, A. (2004). Research in the teaching of speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 26–43.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Taguchi, N. (2011). Pragmatic development as a dynamic, cumulative process: Insights from longitudinal studies of L2 pragmatics. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(3), 211–232.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
